Comparison

Same Mihomo Core, Different GUIs: Which Clash Client Should You Pick?

Many GUIs wrap Mihomo (Clash Meta). The core speaks protocols; the GUI owns subscriptions, Tun, and updates. You’re choosing a shell, not a magic faster kernel.

Circle your three weekly needs: Tun, subscription refresh, Merge/rules. If Clash Verge Rev covers them, switching rarely pays. Also: alternatives, vs CFW.

Read matrices carefully

“Has / hasn’t” is capability, not your line quality. Maintenance and verifiable releases beat obscure toggles. A feature list tells you what the app can do; it says nothing about the nodes behind your subscription.

What you actually useAsk the matrixDo not over-weight
Tun for stubborn appsDoes Tun work reliably here?Theme color, icon shape
Subscription refreshOne-click update, no manual YAML?Number of obscure panels
Merge / custom rulesEditable prepend area?Claims of “faster core”
SafetyVerifiable source & signature?Marketing speed words

Safety specifics: safe or virus.

Trade-offs

  • Want Tun + subscriptions with less pain: modern GUIs like Verge Rev.
  • Want minimal: older shells may work, but you own updates and security.
  • Phones: mobile.

Still torn after a week

Write one line: missing feature / unstable / untrusted source / aesthetics. Fix nodes and rules before blaming the GUI (provider, routing). Most “client is slow” reports are really “node or rule is wrong.”

Migration cost

Re-import your subscription and Merge (backup). Don’t change shell and provider on the same day—you won’t know which move fixed or broke things. Builds: download center; getting started.

Settled on Verge Rev after comparing?

Subscription links are universal, so switching clients needs no reconfiguration. Grab the latest Clash Verge Rev from the download center.